Prohibitions of competition are generally applicable only if they are very well defined. To be enforceable, restrictions on non-competition (a) must be necessary to protect the legitimate interests of employers; (b) must be reasonable in time and geographically; (c) are not contrary to the public interest; and (d) must be supported by counterparties; This means that the employee must receive something in exchange for signing the agreement. The burden of proof lies with the employer to demonstrate that the non-competition clause has met these requirements and the courts will generally not place excessive restrictive agreements; they will simply find them unenforceable. From a technical point of view, it is more likely that a standard non-competition clause will be maintained if the time limit is short, if the geographical scope is small, if the nature of the activity is narrow and the worker is only prohibited from recruiting established clients of his former employer. 14. If the non-competition clause I signed is applied, it means that I absolutely cannot earn a living. What do I do? The application of non-competition rules in the state of Florida is quite common. Some law firms rely on these agreements and represent workers, employers and potential new employers of a worker currently subject to a non-compete clause. The agreement should not be too broad and, in general, difficult to implement if it lasts more than two years.
 However, Florida courts will rarely refuse to impose a non-compete clause because of their length or geographic scope. Instead, Florida law requires courts to affix a „blue pencil“ to an inadmissiblely broad or extended non-compete clause to enforce it within Fla`s limits. Stat. § 542.335.  Even if the agreement is part of a general contract of employment, there is a possibility of prior infringement by an employer. As a result, the non-competition clause of the Treaty becomes inapplicable. However, recent case law in the Florida courts of appeals has undermined the usefulness of the previous defense against offenses.  Vermont: House Bill 556 „would prohibit non-compete agreements or any other agreement that prevents a person from carrying on the legitimate profession, trade or business.“ .